Interesting scenario created by a concerned parent this week. In a culture where many activities revolve around food – such as the pizza party following the buffet lunch or handing out king sized candy bars as a reward for good work in school. So the comment –
“Since they’ve had enough calories, I don’t have to feed them the rest of the day.”
This might work fine if it’s already bedtime but imagine a child who has technically met their calorie requirements by breakfast yet still has to get thru the rest of the day. We can experience hunger even when we have met our calorie needs since hunger is tied to both physiological and psychological triggers. And “calories” are very different from “nutrition”. Focusing on a single aspect of the overall diet is often detrimental. Foods are groups based on the types of nutrients they provide and omitting whole groups of foods can result in nutrient deficiencies. Vegetables anyone?
Therefore the better question to ponder is whether or not your child has met their nutritional needs?